Editorial Policy
CSJ applies an evidence-first editorial model suitable for science, health, universities and academic institutions.
Sources
Stories should identify the originating paper, dataset, institution, conference, official statement or expert source whenever possible. Anonymous material is not treated as verified evidence by default.
Research status
Published findings, preprints, conference abstracts, pilot studies and opinion pieces are labelled according to their actual status.
Conflicts of interest
Authors, institutions and experts should disclose relevant commercial, institutional or personal interests when these may affect interpretation.
Health and psychology
Content is informational and does not replace diagnosis or treatment by qualified professionals. Unsupported therapeutic claims are not presented as established fact.
Sponsored material
Paid or sponsored institutional content must be recognisable. Editorial presentation does not guarantee academic recognition, accreditation or regulatory approval.
Corrections
Correction requests should include the exact statement, evidence supporting the correction and a stable source.
Artificial intelligence
Automation may assist drafting, translation, metadata or formatting, but responsibility for publication remains with the editorial operation.
